Premier League panel's Liverpool verdict is laughable and makes mockery of VAR

Making a mockery of VAR is not that difficult these days. Even in these so-called modern times which continue to embrace ancient but now traditional mistakes.

But this hasn't stopped the Premier League panel from rubbing the nose of a VAR system it continues to tolerate right in the dirt. The latest ruling has decreed Nottingham Forest should not have been awarded a penalty at Liverpool following Alisson's challenge on Neco Williams.

Yet the League's 'Key Match Incidents' (KMI) panel insisted the decision did not reach the threshold for a VAR intervention. So, Michael Oliver was correct not to send referee Sam Barrott to the pitch-side monitor.

The decision helped Forest go 2-1 ahead before a late equaliser saw Liverpool salvage a point. The KMI Panel voted that Barrott should not have given the penalty, but supported the VAR outcome.

JOIN US ON FACEBOOK! Latest news, analysis and much more on Mirror Football's Facebook page

Get our comprehensive football coverage, with news, updates, opinions, analysis and everything that matters to you, straight to your inbox.

To get it, it's a quick and easy one-two:

1. Head THIS WAY

It said: "The contact from Alisson was inevitable as a consequence of his momentum in attempting to save the ball. The contact made was not reckless and below the threshold for a penalty.

"However, the non intervention by the VAR was unanimously supported, on the basis that it was not a clear and obvious error."

Confused yet? Well, here might be a simple explanation to the umpteenth incident in top-flight football to leave a farcical and lasting stain on its current reputation.

The verdict is laughable, because it is essentially admitting not one mistake has been made but two - yet those making them continue to be right. Go figure.

Barrott got it wrong in awarding a penalty in the first place. Then Oliver compounded the mistake by making one of his own, having decided not to send Barrott to the monitor to correct his original blunder.

Should the Premier League scrap VAR? Have your say in the comments section.

Which begs the question - if VAR cannot be used to review or correct potential mistakes, what is the point of it in the first place? The simple answer is, there isn't one.

The introduction of the 'clear and obvious' threshold, which appears ironic in itself, has become the biggest cancer of the VAR era. VAR is supposed to exist to enable officials to make correct decisions.

But according to all of the above, cannot be used when referees make mistakes which are deemed to be too minor. Like costing Liverpool three points at Anfield, right?

The incident involving Alisson and Williams is the kind of scenario VAR was invented for to resolve. Instead, it has made itself, those officials involved, and the English game, look laughable.

Welcome to the new Premier League season, everyone. The best one in the world. And also now, thanks to those in charge of it, the most complicated, confusing and comical one on the planet.

Sky's Essential TV and Sky Sports bundle includes at least 215 live Premier League clashes across the 2026/27 season, with more than 1,500 games from the EFL and beyond, plus F1, golf and darts.